Sunday, 8 November 2015

Cottage Ornee, Campbell Town

Captain Henry Frederick Forth arrived in Van Diemen's Land in 1833 and for a few years he was employed as Director General Of Roads & Bridges. In 1836 he became police magistrate in Campbell Town and the cottage was built for him in that year.

One of his roles was to supervise construction and public works in the area and that included the construction of the Red bridge in Campbell Town. When he left Van Diemen's Land in 1848, he became treasurer of Hong Kong for eighteen years and then spent 6 years as Lieutenant Governor of Jamaica.

The property was also known as Hazeldene at one stage and was the home to the Upton family for over 125 years. It consists of 4 bedrooms, kitchen/dining, lounge room, office and two front rooms, with original ornate features, mantles and established gardens. This beautiful historic cottage remains in wonderful condition and is currently a private residence. It remains an important part of the streetscape of Campbell Town.

Main Text & Information Source - 
Interpretive Sign at the Site

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

Lumeah

Built in 1847, with the verandah added in 1857, this impressive townhouse was orginally known as Beaulieu House and accomodated Mrs Payn's Educational Establishment for Young Ladies.
By 1853, it had become a private boarding house that claimed to "possess all the advantages of a quiet retirement yet remaining in close proximity to the haunts of Hobart Town's business.

Charles James Barclay, the director of the Commercial Bank of Tasmania, purchased the property in 1883 and subsequently changed its name to Lumeah. It was still in Barclay family ownership in the 1950's.

The property has had an interesting history including time as a stately residence and an Officers Club. It was also formerly used for medical consulting rooms. It currently serves as two residences and a professional office space. The flexible layout lends itself to a variety of configurations including professional suites, residences, visitor accommodation, and other potential uses.

The ground floor comprises five offices (or bedroom alternatives), a reception area and waiting room, two utility/storage rooms and a bathroom. The first floor comprises a double bedroom, lounge, kitchen/dining and two bathrooms. The lower ground level has a modern kitchen, sitting room, one bedroom/office, two offices, one cellar, and three utility/storage rooms.

A beautiful verandah with period lacework runs around the northern side of the property and offers a superb position to sit, relax in the sun and enjoy the views. A lush, beautifully established garden surrounds the graceful, three storey Victorian Regency building. This property could easily be returned to its former glory as a very prestigious inner city residence as it is currently in magnificent condition.

Main Text & Information Sources - 
"The Story of Battery Point - Street By Street" - Donald Howatson 2012


Sunday, 1 November 2015

The Penetentiary, Port Arthur

Throughout its operational life, Port Arthur struggled to reach an economically sustainable level of operation. In an ideal world the product of convict labour would provide the raw and manufactured materials necessary for the ongoing maintenance of the station and its occupants. In some regards Port Arthur managed this, with its flourishing timber industry fuelling building works throughout the Peninsula. The meat, flour and vegetables necessary for rations would also be sourced from the farms of Port Arthur and the other Peninsula stations.

All outstations and probation stations had tracts of land under the plough and hoe, Saltwater River and Safety Cove Farm being some of the biggest agricultural stations opened on the Peninsula. A sheep station and slaughtering establishment in the 1840s greatly furthered output. Yet, despite these clear aims, the main weight of rations during the 1830s and especially the 1840s had to be shipped down from Hobart. The 1841 introduction of Probation saw the authorities face almost insurmountable problems rationing the convict population, as the population rose from close to 1500, to over 3500 by 1844. A convict population of this size required over 2.5 ton of flour a day to fulfill the bread ration alone.

The Port Arthur water-powered flour mill and granary had first been suggested in 1839, with the authorities facing the imminent introduction of probation. The suggestions of the colonial Commissariat, who governed the convict ration supply, and Port Arthur's Commandant, saw the project started in 1842 - just as the Peninsula population began to rapidly increase. An engineer, Alexander Clark, was brought in to oversee the mill and granary construction, as well as engineer the supply of water to the wheel. It was hoped that a mill and granary sited on the peninsula would supply the wants of the Convict Department, as well as produce surplus for export.

The whole undertaking was completed by 1845. Comprising a series of dams, millrace, underground aqueduct and overhead water race, getting the water to the 30ft (10m) water wheel was a much more complicated undertaking than anybody had envisaged. The mill and granary building itself was completed in just a year, housing not only a storehouse, wheel and machinery, but also a treadmill capable of taking up to 56 convicts at once.  The treadmill was used when the water supply was unavailable to power the waterwheel. The treadmill consisted of large wheels with horizontal boards between them. The convicts powered the wheel which was basically a never ending stairway that was so tiresome that men could only work on it for a few minutes at a time.

However, the mill was to be a grand failure. The infrastructure bringing the water to the wheel proved to be too complicated, losing water to seepage and evaporation. The supply of water itself was completely inadequate to feed the wheel. In the end, the mill only operated in intermittent bursts, quickly using up any store of water accumulated in the dam.

When Superintendant George Courtney succeeded William Champ as commandant of the settlement in 1848, the mill was not operating successfully at all and so Courtney suggested that the mill should be converted into a penitentiary. At that time the original wooden prisoner’s barracks were very dilapidated and in need of replacement. Although his proposal was approved, it was not until 1854, then under the command of Commandant James Boyd, that work was begun on the conversion and it was not until autumn 1857 that it was ready to house prisoners.

The kitchen and bakehouse were added at the western end of the mill and the quarters for the Watchmen were added to the eastern side. Internally the building was extensively remodeled to provide the prisoners accommodation. Two stories of cells contained in the lower part were arranged in double rows end to end with their fronts facing the external walls of the prison. The prisoners in these sections were also required to wear heavy chains, 13kg for those on the ground floor and 6 kg chains for those on the second floor.

These were a form of extra punishment and added to the difficulty of the work that was required to be performed and constantly caused chafing on the ankles which ultimately caused ulcers. Their trousers buttoned down the outside of the leg to allow the trousers to be removed without removing the chains.

The 2nd floor was converted into the dining room for prisoners on the top dormitory floor were fed. Food was delivered to the mess by the use of a dumb waiter from the kitchen. Prisoners in the other floors were fed in their cells.  Roman Catholic prisoners also used the mess area as a makeshift chapel and it was also used as a library. By 1871, the library was reported to having over 13.000 volumes available. Literacy classes for the prisoners were also held there during the evening.

The upper floor was a general dormitory area 200ft long and 11 ft high designed to accommodate 348 separate sleeping places in two tiers. At the back were the exercise yards, privies and lavatories. Over 600 convicts could be accommodated in the building.

Only a decade after it was first built, the mill was gutted and converted into the Penitentiary. The building was gutted in the 1897 bushfires, burning for nearly 72 hours and lay derelict until a concerted conservation program began in the 1960’s.

The building has just seen the completion of a major conservation project. The project will provide structural stability and environmental protection to the remnant walls, which were at risk due to age and deterioration of the masonry fabric. The work has been necessary to ensure the safety of visitors and guarantee the long-term conservation of the building, one of Port Arthur’s most enduring and famous landmarks.

Main Text & Information Sources – 

“A Vistors Short History Guide To Port Arthur 1830 – 1877 – Alex Graeme-Evans & Michael Ross
“Port Arthur – Convicts & Commandants” – Walter B. Pridmore

Historic Photos – 
Port Arthur Historic Sites, Tasmania Facebook Page

Wednesday, 28 October 2015

Highfield Convict Barracks

The ruins of the old convict barracks built from 1834 and occupied from 1836. In July 1832 there were 41 convicts assigned to the Circular Head settlement in order to help establish Highfield, a number which would rise to 73 before the convict assignment system was shut down. Indentured labourers brought out from Britain and assigned convicts made up the bulk of the VDL Company’s workforce. Arrangements were made for agricultural workers sentenced in England for protest activities to be assigned as Company convicts.

Convicts were essential to the success of the company. Many of the convicts were highly skilled builders and were responsible for the construction of Highfield and its surrounding buildings, including the old convict barracks at Stanley which were used by the Van Diemens Land Co as quarters for employed men in the early days.The government had assigned convicts to settlers on a proportional basis but convicts were never assigned to the VDL Company in the numbers that were originally anticipated by the Directors and their agents. This discrepancy was to become one of the main sources of friction between Edward Curr and Governor Arthur.

It is clear that Curr valued the work of his convicts. In one of his despatches to his employers, he stated “Let it never be forgotten that we owe everything we are and have to our convict labour. Wherever skill or trustworthiness is required, it is not among the free men but amongst the convicts that we are obliged to look”  Although Company convicts had a good reputation, incidents such as the escape of six convicts in a sealing vessel in 1828 or the 1835 plan to capture Circular Head and seize the Company schooner Edward are worthy of note. The lure of higher wages elsewhere in the colony caused many of the indentured workers to abscond or nullify their contracts.

However, despite his favorable comments about his convict workforce, the company’s agent has also been accused of being particularly brutal. Curr employed a flogger, Richardson the Flagellator, and the flogging rate of the convicts under his authority was double that of the rest of the colony. Irrespective of their skills, the convicts were never paid for their labours but were forced to work under a system that was in al but name, slavery!

With the withdrawal of convicts following the closure of the convict assignment system and the introduction of the probation system in the early 1840s the company turned its attention from the use of convicts to attracting tenant farmers to the property.

Main Text & Information Source-
Interpretation signs at the Site